Ok and why do you get to make the rules?
See it doesn’t work that way. A debate is based on what you can proof and disproof and it is so very easy to say “this is wrong I will not read that and so on” and not contribute. Now before you answer consider that forty-eight people accessed these pages and all they see is a basic witch-hunt.
See if other people must provide proof within the parameters set by you then the same is expected of you.
Please help me understand, you are not interested to read any of the post in detail. On other posts you made it clear that you will not view the videos and yet you demand proof. Let’ us consider the internet for the moment.
By its most basic design it allows you to read text as this is one of its many basic yet vital functions. So if you are not willing to read, or view anything at all, how can anyone convey information to you effectively?
Again just tonight about forty eight people viewed these post. What do they see? For one your unwillingness to participate yet your willingness to dismiss and demand proof knowing that no proof can satisfy your parameters.
Any factor that defines a system and determines and or limits its credibility still needs information from both sides. Right now they are getting info from one side and the other nothing at all.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.